Glosa do wyroku Sądu Okręgowego w Legnicy z 9 grudnia 2020 r., IV Kz 285/20
|
Kwartalnik Krajowej Szkoły Sądownictwa i Prokuratury * 2021* tom 44* zeszyt 4* s. 113-121 * ISSN 2083-7186 Glosa do wyroku Sądu Okręgowego w Legnicy z 9 grudnia 2020 r., IV Kz 285/20 A gloss to the judgement of the District Court in Legnica of 9 December 2020, case no. IV Kz 285/20 Dr hab. Czesław P. Kłak, prof. KPSW, Kujawsko-Pomorska Szkoła Wyższa w Bydgoszczy, ORCID 0000-0002-2886-4770 DOI: 10.53024/7.4.44.2021 URL: https://www.kssip.gov.pl/pobierz_plik/07_klak.pdf SUMMARY: The gloss concerns the procedural position of the injured party in the prescriptive proceedings in misdemeanor cases. In the author’s opinion, in the current legal situation, a copy of the injunction sentence in misdemeanor cases should always be delivered to the aggrieved party, who may submit, within 7 days from the delivery of the judgment, not later than simultaneously with the objection to the injunction, a declaration that he will act as an auxiliary prosecutor. The amendment to the Code of Criminal Procedure of July 19, 2019 introduced a general obligation to deliver a copy of the injunction to each injured party, and also applies to the writ proceedings in misdemeanor cases. As a consequence, a special procedure for obtaining the status of an auxiliary prosecutor is provided for. Key words: injunction proceedings, injunction, objection to the injunction, aggrieved, the auxiliary prosecutor Bibliographic Citation: KŁAK, C. Glosa do wyroku Sądu Okręgowego w Legnicy z 9 grudnia 2020 r., IV Kz 285/20, Kwartalnik Krajowej Szkoły Sądownictwa i Prokuratury. 2021, t. 44, z. 4, s. 113-121. ISSN 2083-7186. DOI: 10.53024/7.4.44.2021 |
|
